Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; October 2009; v. 28; no. 10; p. 1212-1219; DOI: 10.1190/1.3249777
© 2009 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Clayton, N.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

SPECIAL SECTION: Hydrogeophysics

Porosity and permeability images based on crosswell seismic measurements integrated with FMI logs at the Port Mayaca aquifer, South Florida

Jorge Parra and Chris Hackert

Southwest Research Institute

Emily Richardson

South Florida Water Management District

Ned Clayton

Schlumberger Water Services

Corresponding author: jparra{at}swri.edu

Abstract

High-resolution crosswell seismic reflection data were acquired at a Port Mayaca aquifer test site about 30 miles west of the Atlantic Ocean and approximately one mile east of the eastern boundary of Lake Okeechobee in Martin County, Florida (Figure 1). Measurements were taken between monitoring wells MF-37 and EXPM-1 at an interwell separation of 1300 ft using a Z-Seis piezoceramic X series source and a 10-level hydrophone system. Multiple source and detector measurements were taken in the interval from 400 to 1700 ft (Figure 2). The objectives of the survey were to map flow-unit variability in the region between the two wells, to assess whether the high-resolution seismic survey could be resolved, detect zones of high-water production, and to map the matrix porosity/permeability.


Figure 1
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Map of project location and well locations.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Crosswell reflection seismic and tomography images correlated with well logs from wells MF-37 and EXPM-1. The velocity tomography is superimposed to the crosswell reflection image.

 






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists