Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; May 2004; v. 23; no. 5; p. 472-480; DOI: 10.1190/1.1756837
© 2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daily, W.
Right arrow Articles by Masica, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Low-cost reservoir tomographs of electrical resistivity

William Daily, Abelardo Ramirez, Robin Newmark and Kenneth Masica

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, U.S.

Corresponding author: daily1@llnl.gov

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The geophysics we describe here will sound different from what you have heard before, because it is different. It uses electric fields instead of seismic waves. It is not designed for exploration. It is a distant cousin of cross borehole seismic tomography, although it is quite different in terms of its application and results. Probably the most curious aspect is that it doesn't chase the holy grail of geophysics—high resolution.

What good could possibly come from a low-resolution, electrical geophysical tool? The answer is found in the paradigm gradually finding favor by oil executives and reservoir engineers: while finding and exploiting large new fields is important for long-term growth, improving recovery efficiency for existing resources also makes sense because developing a new field is increasingly expensive. As a result, secondary recovery methods are receiving increasing attention.

This shift in view requires a parallel shift in geophysics. Now geophysics needs to deliver useful information about field production using low-cost, long-term monitoring techniques that have minimum impact on production operations. Electrical resistance tomography (ERT) is ideally suited to these new goals. ERT is a method for tomographically reconstructing the electrical resistivity distribution in the subsurface using an array of electrodes. Typically, current is driven between two of the electrodes and the resulting voltage distribution is measured on the remaining electrodes. Repeating this with other pairs of current electrodes in the array makes it possible to sample the subsurface electrical properties in a manner that allows calculation of the spatial distribution of those properties. The electrical properties depend strongly on pore fluid content. Consequently, ERT is especially good at giving information on the movements of oil, water, and gas—the principal fluids of interest in a petroleum reservoir.

An important aspect of this method is that the oil well casings themselves are used as . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists