Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; April 2004; v. 23; no. 4; p. 354-365; DOI: 10.1190/1.1729231
© 2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orange, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geologic and shallow salt tectonic setting of the Mad Dog and Atlantis fields

Relationship between salt, faults, and seafloor geomorphology

Daniel L. Orange

AOA Geophysics, Moss Landing, California, U.S.

Michael M. Angell

William Lettis & Associates, San Rafael, California, U.S.

John. R. Brand

Geoscience Earth & Marine Services, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Jim Thomson, Tim Buddin, Mark Williams and William Hart

BP America, Houston, Texas, U.S.

William J. Berger, III

Geoscience Earth & Marine Services, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: Dan_Orange@AOAGeophysics.com

Editor's note: The material in this paper was prepared and presented (OTC Paper 15157) at the 2003 Offshore Technology Conference, 5–8 May in Houston, Texas, U.S., and is published with permission. Acknowledgment is gratefully made to the OTC for granting permission for publication of this work.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Many of today's active hydrocarbon provinces are in areas with mobile substrate (either salt or mud). Interpreting the style and activity of the substrate, and its impact on the seafloor and near-surface environment, is central to understanding the geohazards of such field areas.

Both the Mad Dog and Atlantis prospects are located where the base of the northern Gulf of Mexico continental slope meets the continental rise at the Sigsbee Escarpment (Figure 1). In this area, the Lower Continental Slope at the top of the Escarpment has an average water depth of 4500 ft, and the Upper Continental Rise at the base of the escarpment has an average water depth of 6800 ft (for a thorough and more detailed discussion of salt tectonics, including numerous papers on the Gulf of Mexico and Sigsbee Escarpment, see AAPG Memoir 65). Mad Dog and Atlantis are in the ‘Tabular Salt and Minibasin Province’ of the Gulf of Mexico, characterized by salt sheets and/or tabular salt with more or less flat tops and bottoms. The salt is allochthonous (meaning out of place, as opposed to autochthonous = in place), and the Sigsbee Escarpment represents the seafloor expression of the downslope limit of the allochthonous shallow salt.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Regional seafloor rendering of the northern Gulf of Mexico, showing the location of the Mad Dog and Atlantis prospects (southeastern Green Canyon OCS).

 
Bathymetric data show different seafloor textures across the area, indicating that portions of the Sigsbee have evolved differently in the recent geologic past. These differences are due to a combination of salt morphology, suprasalt stratigraphy, and slumping. The suprasalt section along this portion of the Sigsbee Escarpment contains evidence for active deformation in the form of normal faults with seafloor offset. In the study area, all of the faults on and above . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists