Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; September 2003; v. 22; no. 9; p. 842-847; DOI: 10.1190/1.1614153
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dvorkin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Taner, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Rock physics of a gas hydrate reservoir

Jack Dvorkin and Amos Nur

Stanford University, California, U.S.

Richard Uden and Turhan Taner

Rock Solid Images, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: jack@pangea.stanford.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Gas hydrates are solids composed of a hydrogen-bonded water lattice with entrapped guest molecules of gas. There are convincing arguments that vast amounts of methane gas hydrate are present in sediments under the world's oceans as well as in onshore sediments in the Arctic. This hydrate is possibly the largest carbon and methane pool on earth. As such, methane hydrate may be the principal factor in global climate balancing. One may also treat this methane pool as a potential energy source. These considerations ignite the scientific and business community's interest in quantifying the amount of methane hydrate in the subsurface.

Gas hydrate reservoir characterization is, in principle, no different from the traditional hydrocarbon reservoir characterization. Similar and well-developed remote sensing techniques can be used, seismic reflection profiling being the dominant among them.

Seismic response of the subsurface is determined by the spatial distribution of the elastic properties. By mapping the elastic contrast, the geophysicist can illuminate tectonic features and geobodies, hydrocarbon reservoirs included. To accurately translate elastic-property images into images of lithology, porosity, and the pore-filling phase, quantitative knowledge is needed that relates the rock's elastic properties to its bulk properties and conditions. Specifically, to quantitatively characterize a natural gas hydrate reservoir, we must be able to relate the elastic properties of the sediment to the volume of gas hydrate present and, if at all possible, the permeability. One way of achieving this goal is through rock physics effective-medium modeling.


    Rock physics models in perspective
 
Several attempts to construct a relation between hydrate concentration and the compressional velocity in sediments have followed the path of modifying the popular Wyllie's time average equation which states that total traveltime through rock is the volume-weighted sum of traveltimes through the solid phase and the fluid phase considered independently of each other; i.e., VP–1 = (1-{phi}) VPS–1 + {phi}. . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists