Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; September 2001; v. 20; no. 9; p. 974-977; DOI: 10.1190/1.1487318
© 2001 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaiser, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spitz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Multicomponent technology: the players, problems, applications, and trends

Summary of the workshop sessions

James Gaiser and Nick Moldoveanu

WesternGeco, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Colin Macbeth

Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, U.K.

Reinaldo Michelena

Pdvsa, Caracas, Venezuela

Simon Spitz

CGG Americas, Houston, Texas, U.S.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The 2000 SEG/EAGE Summer Research Workshop drew a large proportion of participants from contracting firms (Figure 1a). The affiliation of first authors was also largely from contractors (Figure 1b), with the remainder of participants and first authors being evenly distributed between oil companies and academia. If these statistics can be taken as a genuine cross-section of the geophysical community, they indicate that contractors have the most interest in multicomponent technology. It would also appear that they perform most of the research work. More than 40% of the papers presented in the workshop were related to processing, model building, and imaging with PS waves, thus indicating where the current emphasis on research and applications lies. Less emphasis was observed in other important areas of application for multicomponent technology, such as lithology, fluids, fracture characterization and time-lapse studies.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Participants at the Boise workshop grouped by (a) professional affiliation, (b) affiliation of the first author of the papers presented, and (c) geographic provenance.

 
Interestingly, although the workshop took place in the U.S. heartland, participants from Europe, Canada, and Latin America combined exceeded the number of U.S. nationals in attendance (Figure 1c). Could this signify that interest in shear-wave technology is higher outside the United States? It would seem so, especially in view of the fact that the activity generated by the multicomponent acquisition in the United States to date has been less than in the rest of the world, particularly in Europe.

It is noteworthy that contractors kept that level of effort and interest during the 1999–2000 downturn, despite the fact that they do not consider the technology to be a commercial success. This may indicate that if the technology does not become profitable to contractors in the near future, more than half of the worldwide effort . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
P. KRISTIANSEN and J. WAGGONER
Using multicomponent seismic data to better characterize and manage reservoirs
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 1377 - 1384.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists