Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; February 2000; v. 19; no. 2; p. 197-202; DOI: 10.1190/1.1438576
© 2000 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Abdelsalam, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Creating virtual 3-D outcrop

Xueming Xu, Carlos L. V. Aiken, Janok P. Bhattacharya, Rucsandra M. Corbeanu, Kent C. Nielsen, George A. McMechan and Mohamed G. Abdelsalam

University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: aiken@utdallas.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Because of the high precision of present-day GPS and reflectorless laser technology, geologic information and remotely sensed data (i.e., seismic and GPR grids, wells) can be positioned accurately in 3-D and reconstructed as a virtual image. Hence, we have developed the "virtual outcrop" for applications that require knowledge about the 3-D spatial arrangements of rock types.

This article shows how we have applied digital methodology to geologic reconnaissance and in detailed outcrop mapping, including characterization of an outcrop as a reservoir analog where we merged detailed outcrop mapping with geophysical GPR survey data, wells, and stratigraphic sections.

Mapping is the foundation of the geologic sciences. The fact that specific observations are attached to specific geographic locations is critical in evaluating spatial and temporal relationships. The three basic elements necessary for a useful geologic map are location, lithologic information, and spatial or geometric relationships. Digital mapping is considerably more precise than traditional field methods and allows information to be gathered accurately in 3-D. It also allows data to be collected from remote or inaccessible locations, such as on vertical cliff faces. We have coined the term "cybermapping" to describe these techniques because they differ from typical GIS data bases which are built by digitizing hard-copy sources (e.g., paper maps).

GPS incorporates signals from multiple satellites to triangulate a position on the surface of the earth. The distinctive feature of GPS is that the location generated is "geocentric" (i.e., it is relative to the center of the earth). This means that measurements taken in one place can be directly compared to any other GPS position. The rapid development of this technology has produced significant cost reduction; an increase in capabilities; and faster, more "friendly" data reduction; in addition, it is considerably more precise than traditional field mapping in most cases. Consequently, the . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeosphereHome page
D. Kurtzman, J. A. El Azzi, F. J. Lucia, J. Bellian, C. Zahm, and X. Janson
Improving fractured carbonate-reservoir characterization with remote sensing of beds, fractures, and vugs
Geosphere, April 1, 2009; 5(2): 126 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
P. D. White and R. R. Jones
A cost-efficient solution to true color terrestrial laser scanning
Geosphere, June 1, 2008; 4(3): 564 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
M. Alfarhan, L. White, D. Tuck, and C. Aiken
Laser rangefinders and ArcGIS combined with three-dimensional photorealistic modeling for mapping outcrops in the Slick Hills, Oklahoma
Geosphere, June 1, 2008; 4(3): 576 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
M. I. Olariu, J. F. Ferguson, C. L.V. Aiken, and X. Xu
Outcrop fracture characterization using terrestrial laser scanners: Deep-water Jackfork sandstone at Big Rock Quarry, Arkansas
Geosphere, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 247 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
R. R. Jones, K. J. W. Mccaffrey, J. Imber, R. Wightman, S. A. F. Smith, R. E. Holdsworth, P. Clegg, N. De Paola, D. Healy, and R. W. Wilson
Calibration and validation of reservoir models: the importance of high resolution, quantitative outcrop analogues
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 309(1): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
J. A. Bellian, R. Beck, and C. Kerans
Analysis of hyperspectral and lidar data: Remote optical mineralogy and fracture identification
Geosphere, December 1, 2007; 3(6): 491 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
X. Janson, C. Kerans, J. A. Bellian, and W. Fitchen
Three-dimensional geological and synthetic seismic model of Early Permian redeposited basinal carbonate deposits, Victorio Canyon, west Texas
AAPG Bulletin, October 1, 2007; 91(10): 1405 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
J.A. Bellian, C. Kerans, and D.C. Jennette
Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2005; 75(2): 166 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists