Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2005; v. 24; no. 1; p. 76-79; DOI: 10.1190/1.1859706
© 2005 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Improved modeling of gas condensate reservoirs by integrating static and dynamic data

Yuqi Du and Linhua Guan

ChevronTexaco, Houston, USA

Corresponding author: dyuq@chevrontexaco.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Mature and complex reservoirs are usually covered by many kinds of static and dynamic data—i.e. petrophysical, PVT, well testing, geologic, completion, and reservoir production information. This paper illustrates an effective methodology to develop a consistent simulation model, via integration of the available static and dynamic data sets, that allows better understanding of the subsurface reservoir flow characteristics.

A complex gas condensate reservoir, referred to as reservoir X and first put into production 14 years ago, serves as the example in this paper. There is abundance of available data from different sources. However, the data can not be directly applied to build a reservoir prediction model because of the various measurement scales—e.g., core = about 0.1 ft long, log = tens of feet away from wellbore, and reservoir simulation = hundreds of feet for the grid size. In some cases, the same parameter is derived from different sources—i.e., permeability from core samples, logging data, and pressure transient test. Due to the extreme intrinsic complexity of reservoir X, actual subsurface flow characteristics were not well understood before this study. By using the proposed methodology, a reliable, coherent and improved reservoir simulation model was built.

In the past decade, the multidisciplinary approach (usually including geology, geophysics, petrophysics, reservoir engineering, and production engineering) has gained popularity in industry's attempt to achieve more effective reservoir management. This paper focuses on a multidisciplinary approach that integrated PVT data, well tests, geologic, petrophysical, and dynamic reservoir production information to build a reservoir simulation model, which can be used to predict reservoir performance.


    Reservoir X background
 
Reservoir X, discovered in early 1980s in Tarim Basin (P.R. China), is a gas condensate reservoir without oil rim. Geologic formations of this reservoir are relatively flat with only a few degrees of inclination. The depositional environment is fluvial-delta with bedded sandstones. The southern boundary . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists