Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2005; v. 24; no. 1; p. 56-62; DOI: 10.1190/1.1859702
© 2005 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esmersoy, C.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seismic MWD

Drilling in time, on time, it's about time

Cengiz Esmersoy, Andrew Hawthorn, Chris Durrand and Phil Armstrong

Schlumberger, Sugar Land, Texas, USA

Corresponding author: esmersoy@sugar-land.oilfield.slb.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Since the dawn of logging-while-drilling (LWD) in the 1980s, the industry has wanted a reliable while-drilling borehole seismic measurement. However, a number of technical roadblocks prohibited its realization until recently. These difficulties included the nature and required accuracy of the measurement, timing issues, sensors, automation, and the lack of an electrical connection between the downhole tools and the surface in a while-drilling configuration.

Technological solutions to these roadblocks have since been found, and today seismic MWD (seismic measurement-while-drilling) tools acquire and transmit seismic data in real time during the drilling process, without interfering with normal rig operations and without loss of rig time.

In high-cost or high-risk environments, particularly including those with significant seismic uncertainties, this technology can positively impact the cost of exploration and development drilling. Seismic MWD data is delivered in real time, so it can be used to make critical decisions while a well is being drilled. It also saves rig time by replacing intermediate wireline check-shot surveys and thus eliminates the need to stop the drilling process and pull drilling equipment out of the hole for the duration of a survey.

This technology has proven beneficial in a range of applications and some drillers are becoming accustomed to the frequently updated "bit-on-seismic" displays that it provides. The following examples of this technology demonstrate how it is being used to significantly reduce risk and uncertainty, enabling better decision-making during well construction operations and directly impacting drilling costs in the high-risk, high-uncertainty sphere of operations.


    Check-shot and velocity data in real time
 
Check-shot surveys provide direct measurements of seismic traveltimes from the surface to survey positions along the well trajectory and thus can be used to calibrate the depth scale of a surface seismic image at these positions. Real-time seismic traveltimes (check shots), in combination with survey data, are used to plot and track the . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists