Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2005; v. 24; no. 1; p. 50-54; DOI: 10.1190/1.1859701
© 2005 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mouret, C.
Right arrow Articles by Chastang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A new method for efficient fast-track evaluation and assessment of the re-engineering potential of mature fields

Claude Mouret, Jean-Paul Valois, Eric Mastin and Jean Chastang

Total, Pau, France

Corresponding author: claude.mouret@total.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Many challenges must be faced when exploiting oil and gas fields. Mature fields throw up additional challenges which need to be examined in detail, so that the oil or gas which remains to be produced can be extracted in the most economical way. Initial production in mature fields often dates back to a time when techniques were not what they are at present. Consequently, the quantity, quality, and availability of data may vary considerably and often fall short of our expectations as geoscientists. As our aim is to maximize hydrocarbon recovery, optimize economics, and enhance the exploitation of vanishing natural resources, we must investigate field behavior and reservoir characteristics with the appropriate accuracy.

Processing and integrating all data as fully as possible is of paramount importance to maximize the amount and quality of information that can be extracted from any available data—whether it is numerical or qualitative. For instance, production rates strongly depend on the geologic characteristics, reservoir properties, and fluid composition of the field; knowledge of these three parameters enables production behavior to be understood, provided necessary precautions are taken. In addition, the possible effects of well activation or events on the surface network must be clarified using operations data records, and taken into account. In this way, production data can provide significant information on geology, and this additional knowledge can be used to refine the geologic model. In turn, the refined model improves interpretation of the dynamic behavior of the reservoir. Iterative cross-interpretations of all static and dynamic data and processing results provide better understanding of those reservoirs for which production history files are available.

This complex, iterative, workflow brings additional information on reservoir characteristics and performance. It often highlights previously unknown features which are present at a subseismic scale; these include lineaments, barriers of various kinds, vertically . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists