Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2005; v. 24; no. 1; p. 42; DOI: 10.1190/1.1859699
© 2005 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahrer, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The threads of writing

Kenneth D. Mahrer

US Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, USA

Corresponding author: kmahrer@do.usbr.gov

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Threads run through documents and hold them together. What are the threads? Simply, threads are topics. They are found by compiling, in order, the (grammatical) subjects of neighboring sentences and clauses. For example, if you underline all the subjects within a paragraph, this assemblage will group into topics. Easy-to-follow writing usually has one, two, or, at most, three easy-to-identify threads running through and, possibly, interwoven within the paragraph. Disjointed, hard-to-follow writing has more and, here, more may include isolated threads (i.e., a subject that lacks threading to preceding or proceeding subjects), or no, or very little discernable thread structure. Identifying and unraveling the thread structure of a document and adjusting to make it consistent can be an important editing tool.

Here is an example I adapted from the first paragraph of an article Physics Today ("Lorentz invariance on trial," July 2004). To stress my point, I specifically chose a topic that can bring smart people to their knees—Einstein relativity and Lorentz invariance.

Expecting to measure different speeds, in 1887 Michelson and Morley performed an experiment on light in different reference frames that gave null result. In terms of the physics concepts prevalent at that time, it was surprisingly difficult to explain these results; fundamental changes were required in the notions of space and . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists