|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Lyatsky Geoscience Research & Consulting, Calgary, Canada
Alberta Energy & Utilities Board/Alberta Geological Survey, Edmonton, Canada
Geosoft, Toronto, Canada
Corresponding author: dinu.pana@gov.ab.ca
Editor's note: This paper is based on a presentation at the 2003 Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists/Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists Joint Convention in Calgary.
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Exploration for a wide range of mineral deposits is critically dependent on knowledge of the location and age of fractures and faults. Oil and gas fields in many sedimentary basins are distributed along fault-controlled linear trends, and fault identification is often used effectively for target-area selection in hydrocarbon exploration. Similarly, mineral deposits in various geologic settings are commonly associated with fluid-conducting faults. In the platformal, Phanerozoic Alberta sedimentary basin in western Canada (Figure 1), two fundamentally different types of crystalline-basement structure, formed in different tectonic conditions, are recognized (Lyatsky et al., 1999):
| |||||||||||
The steep, brittle basement faults in the western Canadian platforms and Cordilleran foreland, although much more subtle than their spectacular counterparts in western United States, exerted considerable syn- and postdepositional influence on the Phanerozoic sedimentary cover.
Occasionally, brittle faults and fractures follow the older orogenic basement structures, but commonly cut across them. Even when subresolution seismically, many brittle faults appear to have controlled basin sedimentation and diagenesis. The control was partial, episodic, variable, and sometimes even passive and indirect, such as where
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |