Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lynn, H. B. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The winds of change

Anisotropic rocks—their preferred direction of fluid flow and their associated seismic signatures—Part 2

Lynn Incorporated, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: heloise@lynn-inc.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

A Summary of Part 1 and Introduction to Part 2 Our complex earth has a continuum of all scales of ordered heterogeneities. Ordered heterogeneities give rise to three types of seismic observations, depending upon the relationship between the wavelength and the scale length of the ordered heterogeneity: Reflections that arise from layers 3/8ths wavelength thick or greater. Azimuthal scattering, azimuthal attenuation, and azimuthal dispersion that arise from aligned ordered heterogeneities with scale lengths 0.01 – 0.4 wavelength. Azimuthal anisotropy = azimuthal variations of traveltimes (and amplitude) that show a 90° variation between fast-to-slow on offsets approximately equal to target depth that arise from aligned ordered heterogeneities that are very small relative to the wavelength. Unequal horizontal stresses and/or aligned ordered heterogeneities (fractures) can cause azimuthal anisotropy. Equivalent media theory and "their penny-shaped cracks" are used to model and explain these observations. In this category, little or no change of phase over azimuth is observed and little or no change of frequency with azimuth (fixed offset) is observed. Azimuthal variation of frequency (fixed offset) does occur and is observed, but this is probably an azimuthal scattering effect, and as such is more properly located under item 2. Standard industry seismic imaging (prestack time, prestack depth) routinely does a good job with reflections for limited azimuthal ranges. Our industry also has software to measure, quantify, and output the azimuthal variations in traveltimes. But, the effects listed in item 2 (azimuthal dispersion, azimuthal attenuation, and azimuthal phase) are routinely ignored and obliterated. Trace-by-trace spectral whitening is the epitome of what erases this signal. The intent of "The winds of change" is to invite a reconsideration of how we ought to be treating azimuthal phase/scattering/dispersion/attenuation/spectra for this is where we find the information on the long scale lengths of fractures with the wider . . . [Full Text of this Article]

 

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. P. Wennberg, T. Svana, M. Azizzadeh, A. M. M. Aqrawi, P. Brockbank, K. B. Lyslo, and S. Ogilvie Fracture intensity vs. mechanical stratigraphy in platform top carbonates: the Aquitanian of the Asmari Formation, Khaviz Anticline, Zagros, SW Iran Petroleum Geoscience, August 1, 2006; 12(3): 235 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]