Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; October 2004; v. 23; no. 10; p. 1066-1069; DOI: 10.1190/1.1813355
© 2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hornman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Data acquisition over the Lunskoye gas cloud

Kees Hornman

Shell International Exploration and Production, Rijswijk, The Netherlands

Corresponding author: Kees.Hornman@shell.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Obtaining a good seismic image under a gas cloud can be a considerable challenge. The gas cloud can cause strong lateral variations in the P-wave velocities, leading to severe ray bending and scattering, and it can cause high absorption and high transmission losses. Lunskoye Field, in shallow waters offshore Sakhalin (a Russian island north of Japan), is one of those fields suffering from imaging problems due to gas above the reservoir, close to the seafloor. As shown in Figure 1, the field is elongated in the N-S direction. A time migration of a 3D streamer survey, acquired in 1996, did show a large wipeout zone over the crest of the structure. This 3D survey was acquired with inlines along the long axis of the field for operational reasons; on the west side the water depths get very shallow, complicating any vessel turns in the E-W direction. In order to correct for the ray bending effects of the gas, a 3D prestack depth migration (PSDM) was carried out in 1997 and these results were a clear improvement over the time migration (Figure 2). However, Figure 3 shows that, even after 3D PSDM, a wipe-out zone with a width of 1.5 km still covers the crest of the structure.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Bathymetry map of the survey area. Sakhalin Island is to the west of this map. Lunskoye Field is indicated by dark blue. The rectangular survey outline measures 13 x 25 km.

 

Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A crossline (E-W) of the time migration with fixed gain (left) and the prestack depth migration (right, displayed in depth) of the 1996 survey.

 

Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Wipe-out zone after time migration (top) and after prestack depth migration (bottom).

 
Clearly, the available seismic data are inadequate for field development. Production wells have to be drilled through active fault planes and with these . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists