Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; October 2004; v. 23; no. 10; p. 1049-1052; DOI: 10.1190/1.1813359
© 2004 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Neff, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Teepee technology applied to C-wave acquisition design

J.W. (Tom) Thomas

Dawson Geophysical, Midland, Texas, U.S.

Warren H. Neff

Bartlesville, Oklahoma, U.S.

Corresponding author: thomas@dawson3d.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The goal of this multicomponent (C-wave) design methodology is to transfer the well-known principles of the P-wave design process to the design of the acquisition of a C-wave survey. The optimum result is a C-wave seismic survey with bin-to-bin attributes of uniform fold, azimuth, and offset.

It is assumed that most C-wave surveys will be recorded in conjunction with a P-wave survey. Therefore, in this article, an example C-wave "fitted" survey will be presented within the framework of the P-wave design parameters. Alterations to the P-wave survey are normal and usually require more field effort along with increased cost. The fundamentals demonstrated within this article apply to both land and ocean-bottom cable C-wave acquisition. The concepts are developed from examples with first-order or asymptotic travel path assumptions. With some modifications, the methodology will handle more exact travel path equations such as described by Thomsen (1999).


    Background
 
A "teepee" (Thomas et al., 2004) is the subsurface earth volume containing the common reflection point locations of the time versus source-receiver offset (SR) volume for a 3D seismic trace gather. Trace gathers are commonly constructed using common source, common receiver, or hybrid (source and receiver) criteria. Once the P-wave surface coverage of maximum source-receiver offset, or aperture, is linked to the teepee, the P-wave design process simplifies into four issues. Determine: (1) the source and/or receiver station density to determine the desired bin dimension, (2) the amount of overlap of the teepees for the required survey fold, (3) the total number of teepees required to ensure an adequate full-fold image area, and (4) the balance of the source and receiver effort to achieve an economic survey. The attributes of the linked P-wave teepees are considered equal for all geologic layers of the earth model, because the VP/VS ratio (VPS) is . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists