|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
BP America, Houston, Texas, U.S.
Rice University, Houston, Texas, U.S.
Corresponding author: belopoav@bp.com
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Seismic imaging of carbonate systems is often more complicated than their siliciclastic counterparts. Carbonates sediments typically get cemented very early, and their seismic velocities are normally faster than those of siliciclastic sediments. This reduces the resolution of carbonates in comparison to the clastics when using identical acquisition design. Carbonates are also easily dissoved which may lead to karsting, a phenomenon unique to carbonate rocks. Karst surfaces commonly form highly irregular topography that causes energy dispersion, and makes it difficult to image the sediments or rocks below it.
Our understanding and interpretation of seismic data depend on the ability to correctly image major surfaces and packages. Interpretation is often driven by comparisons to the better studied examples, or analogs. The Tertiary carbonate system of the Maldives provides an excellent example of a well-imaged carbonate megaplatform, and the learning from this study may be applied to aid the interpretation of other carbonate systems.
| The Maldives carbonate system |
|---|
| |||||||||||
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Zampetti, W. Schlager, J.-H. van Konijnenburg, and A.-J. Everts 3-D Seismic Characterization of Submarine Landslides on a Miocene Carbonate Platform (Luconia Province, Malaysia) Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2004; 74(6): 817 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |