Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; June 2003; v. 22; no. 6; p. 550-554; DOI: 10.1190/1.1587675
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zou, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Time-lapse well log analysis, fluid substitution, and AVO

Ying Zou and Laurence R. Bentley

University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Corresponding author: zou@geo.ucalgary.ca

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Time-lapse seismic monitoring of reservoirs is based on changing seismic response due to fluid saturation, temperature, and pressure changes. The observable changes in seismic response can help locate bypassed oil, water- or gas-flood fronts, and heated zones.

However, there are risks associated with a 4D seismic project including false anomalies caused by acquisition, processing artifacts, and the ambiguity of seismic interpretation in relating seismic changes to reservoir changes. Lumley and Behrens (1998) proposed a four-step feasibility and risk assessment study before undertaking a 4D seismic project. The proposed third step is seismic modeling from sonic and density logs. Our study demonstrates a procedure for the modeling of time-lapse seismic response changes due to simulated changes to well logs. We also simulate AVO changes at a gas-oil contact (GOC) and an oil-water contact (OWC). The objective of time-lapse AVO is to distinguish between reflections from a gas or oil sand that has been flooded by gas or water. As a model, we use a well log from White Rose Field, offshore Newfoundland, Canada. Three production scenarios are investigated. The method for calculating the seismic response changes is based on the Gassmann equation and a modification of the procedure described by Bentley et al. (2000).


    Theory and method
 
Gassmann's equation relates the bulk modulus of a saturated rock Ku), to the dry rock bulk modulus Kd), the solid grain modulus Ks), the fluid bulk modulus Kf), and the porosity {phi}. Densities are calculated from

(1)

(2)

(3)
where {rho}o, {rho}g, {rho}w, {rho}s, {rho}u, {rho}f, are the densities of oil, gas, water, solid grains, saturated reservoir rock, and fluid mixture at reservoir conditions. Sg, So, and Sw are gas saturation, oil saturation, and water saturation, respectively. The density {rho}std is the density of oil or gas at standard conditions. Rs is the gas oil . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists