Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; April 2003; v. 22; no. 4; p. 351-355; DOI: 10.1190/1.1572089
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, A.
Right arrow Articles by MacBeth, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Seawater velocity variations and real-time reservoir monitoring

Alexandre Bertrand and Colin MacBeth

Heriot-Watt Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Edinburgh, UK

Corresponding author: alex.bertrand@pet.hw.ac.uk

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

As industry moves toward exploring and producing in deeper water areas, the impact of velocity variations in the water layer will become more critical. Acquisition crews are very much aware of this phenomenon. For example it is known that large salinity variations caused by salt seabed outcrop or fresh river water dumping can introduce velocity contrasts strong enough to create a reflection in the water column (such as the 3 s brine reflection in the Orca Basin, Gulf of Mexico) or can affect the balance of towed streamers. On the other hand, this problem requires more careful examination than is currently being undertaken by processing geophysicists and interpreters: Only the issue of velocity variations between infill and original acquisitions has been studied (Wombell, 1997 and MacKay and Fried, 2002).

In this work we address the issue of seawater velocity variations in the time-lapse analysis, which was highlighted in a paper on the challenges of deepwater by Barley (1999). We focus on permanent installations, as these are believed to provide highly repeatable 4D signatures. In the context of the instrumented oilfield, permanent installations will allow more frequent (every few months) "on demand" seismic data acquisitions. These will provide high resolution monitoring of subtle reservoir changes. It is anticipated that these changes could be distorted or even masked by seawater velocity changes.

In this paper, we first present background information on the speed of sound in water followed by some examples of seawater velocity variation analysis from the shallow Gulf of Mexico and West of Shetlands (north of the United Kingdom) using seismic tomography and oceanographic data. We then assess the potential impact of seawater velocity variations on real-time reservoir monitoring through synthetic seismic modeling.


    Generalities on water velocity
 
Speed of sound in water has been extensively studied by the acoustic and oceanographic communities through lab . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists