Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; April 2003; v. 22; no. 4; p. 340-343; DOI: 10.1190/1.1572087
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Borselen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Brittan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Target-oriented adaptive subtraction in data-driven multiple removal

Roald van Borselen, Grog Fookes and John Brittan

PGS Geophysical, Walton-on-Thames, England

Corresponding author: Roald.van.Borselen@pgs.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Data-driven multiple removal methods have proven a valuable addition to the demultiple toolbox for three main reasons. Firstly, such methods do not make use of any a priori information about the subsurface geology and, therefore, such information cannot bias the solutions. Secondly, data-driven methods can be applied in either 1D, 2D, or 3D mode and can therefore account for the full, multidimensional complexity of the earth. Finally, because no a priori information is used, the required user interaction is minimized. These methods are now applied in production-style processing environments with comparable speed and turn-around as conventional techniques.

In general, data-driven multiple removal is accomplished in two steps. First, multiples are predicted through convolutions of preprocessed common-shot and common-receiver gathers in time and space. Subsequently, the predicted multiples are subtracted from the input data using the minimum energy criterion, which states that the total energy after subtraction of the multiples should be minimized. Using adaptive subtraction techniques, the predicted multiples are removed by designing Wiener filters in overlapping windows. In general, this works well. However, when the set of predicted multiples is complex, the "standard" implementation may fail, because no filter can be found that subtracts all predicted multiples in an optimal manner. In this article, an approach is discussed that allows for constrained adaptive subtraction, where multiples are discriminated from other multiples based on frequency and/or dip. The method is illustrated with two marine field data examples.


    Background
 
The aim of data-driven multiple elimination methods is to remove all multiples that have been generated by either the free-surface or internal boundaries. Many authors have described ways to arrive at the same integral equation for the multiple-free pressure wavefield in terms of the multiple-contaminated measured pressure wavefield. In all formulations, the source wavelet must be known to solve the pertinent integral equation. . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists