Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; April 2003; v. 22; no. 4; p. 320-322; DOI: 10.1190/1.1572084
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Won, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Small frequency-domain electromagnetic induction sensors

How in The world does a small broadband EMI sensor with little or no source-receiver separation work?

I. J. Won

Geophex, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.

Corresponding author: ijwon@geophex.com

Editor's note: The Meter Reader is a regular column in TLE, originated by the Gravity and Magnetics Committee and currently coordinated by John Peirce, that seeks to highlight new ideas in geophysical fields besides seismic—particularly gravity, magnetics, and electromagnetics. If you have a short contribution on these topics that is written in the relatively informal but informative style of TLE, please submit it to Dean Clark, editor of TLE in Tulsa, or to John Peirce, at GEDCO in Calgary. This article describes a new class of small EM sensors that have successfully overcome one of the inherent limitations that many of us were brought up to accept as gospel. The examples in this paper represent the solutions developed by one company. They are used as examples, and this usage does not imply they are the only solutions or that these products are endorsed by SEG. The author and I thank Ted Glenn for a very helpful review.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Over the past several decades, we have witnessed the emergence of portable electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors: to name a few, Geonics pioneered portable sensors such as EM-31, EM-34, and EM-61; Zonge Engineering successfully developed and marketed variations of controlled-source EMI sensors. These portable and popular EMI sensors have been used successfully for many geophysical investigations, particularly for shallow engineering and environmental surveys.

The most recent entry in this field is a new generation of one-man portable, digital, broadband EMI sensors developed by Geophex: the GEM-2 has a separation of 1.67 m between the transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX), while the GEM-3 has no practical separation because all coils are collocated in a concentric circular disk (Figure 1). Both sensors have a 30-Hz data rate at typical 3–10 simultaneous frequencies and, currently, a bandwidth of 30 Hz to 48 kHz, a span of about three decades. Each weighs about 4 kg (8 pounds) and comes in a single handheld package. The primary incentive for such small sensors is obvious: portability and speed.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Portable, digital, broadband EMI sensors. The instrument in the left photo has three linearly spaced coils with a maximum separation of 1.67 m. The concentric instrument in the right photo comes in three disk sizes up to 96 cm in diameter. The largest one is typically cart-mounted.

 
Most traditional EMI sensors have separate TX and RX coils connected by cables. This is due to the notion that the TX-RX separation ultimately governs the depth of exploration: the farther they are separated, the deeper we can see. If that notion is indisputably true, one may ask: How in the world do handheld broadband EMI sensors with small or no TX-RX separations see any depth at all? A short answer: They work because the RX is designed not to . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists