Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; November 2003; v. 22; no. 11; p. 1116-1118
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Méndez-Hernández, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A brief history and recent advances in seismic technology for the petroleum industry in Mexico

Efraín Méndez-Hernández

Pemex Exploración y Producción, Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico

Corresponding author: emendezh@pep.pemex.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Seismic prospecting in Mexico dates from 1923 when refraction techniques were applied for the first time in The Golden Lane and the Gulf Coast of the United States to delineate salt domes and reefs (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Historical facts on seismic technology in Mexico

 
In Mexico, like most of the rest of the world, 3D surveys currently dominate seismic activity. The value of 3D is illustrated by Figure 1 which shows that the 2D seismic interpretation of Campeche Bay in the 1970s missed structural features and important fields that are evident on the 3D interpretation. 3D seismic data has been a reliable guide to such important new fields as Sihil, which underlies the giant Cantarell Field, and has been key recovering most of the present reserves in mature fields such as the Tabasco-Chiapas area. Today, 3D surveys account for 95% of the onshore and offshore contracts.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Improvement in seismic analysis of Campeche Bay, left, 2D seismic (1974); right, 3D seismic (1999).

 

    Technology strategies
 
Pemex reviews in 1996 and 2000 revealed strengths and weaknesses in technology management. The goal was to develop a technology strategy that would close the gap with the major oil companies. As a result of the 1996 study, Pemex E&P became a "strong technology follower"—i.e., one that uses the best existing technology practices, which others have successfully tested (Figure 2).


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Pemex upstream technology strategy. A "strong follower" is considered one who stands two steps behind the leader and follows the best existing technology practices tested by others.

 
A corporate strategy was designed that considered people, overall corporate goals, new investments in technology, selection of technology providers, improvement of in-house skills, and the development of better databases and computing resources. By 2000, Pemex E&P's new strategy had boosted its seismic capabilities in:





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists