Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2003; v. 22; no. 1; p. 58-60; DOI: 10.1190/1.1542758
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karbarz, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Grid computing for seismic processing

Frank Karbarz

TruGrid, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: fkarbarz@trugrid.net

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

To state the obvious, technical computing is essential to successful exploration for and development of natural resources because it, if available in sufficient quantity, is what allows engineers and geoscientists to access/process huge volumes of raw seismic data, display the information in various formats that facilitate interpretation, and manipulate the data to simulate complex reservoir depletion scenarios. However, despite decreasing costs for computing hardware, the total cost of owning and maintaining an ever-growing server infrastructure effectively limits many companies from truly exploiting the full potential of technical computing.

At first, technical computing seems like a scalability problem—i.e., it's a function of how much computing power it takes to solve a problem. You can temporarily solve that problem by purchasing additional or more powerful servers. But that creates an economic problem—i.e., how much does it cost to own and manage the servers? The cost of distributed server infrastructures is compounded by the complexity of the network, not to mention that the real value-added is in the application that runs on the servers, not the servers themselves.

This is a classic dilemma in the geoscience industry. However, a recent revelation—computers connected by a network resemble an electricity grid—is threatening to completely change the economics of technical computing. The reason is that, collectively, any number of computers on the grid can be aggregated and utilized to expedite a solution to a computational problem. After the unfamiliarity and security concerns are addressed, the defining metric for any computing problem is simply time—i.e., how quickly can a satisfactory result be computed?

So, what is the status of grid computing? Is it on the immediate horizon? The evolution of grid computing is much like that of the Internet, which was originally a network to link academic information resources. The "founder" of grid computing is Ian Foster, . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists