Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2003; v. 22; no. 1; p. 18-25; DOI: 10.1190/1.1542751
© 2003 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masaferro, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jauffred, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

3D visualization of carbonate reservoirs

Jose Luis Masaferro, Ruth Bourne and Jean-Claude Jauffred

Shell International E&P B.V., Rijswijk, The Netherlands

Corresponding author: JoseLuis.Massaferro@shell.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Conventional 2D and 3D seismic mapping is not ideal for characterizing carbonate reservoirs mainly because of the complexity and heterogeneity of carbonate systems. The unique depositional systems of carbonate environments means that a standard interpretation routine is often inadequate and more sophisticated techniques are needed.

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate an advanced method—the application of visualization techniques to 3D seismic data of some selected carbonate reservoirs and to particularly focus on certain techniques that successfully extracted seismic facies and geometries characteristic of carbonate systems.

We approached the data analysis in two ways. The first approach is to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the seismic data. This may be accomplished, for example, by applying noise reduction techniques to improve the quality of the seismic data or by making depositional geometries explicit rather than implicit features. The second approach is to highlight specific geologic features that have a three-dimensional extent, and a geometry that may have little in common with the orientation of the 3D grid of seismic data. For example, in an environment of hydrocarbon-bearing shoal complexes, there is an immediate focus to the interpretation by initially isolating high-amplitude mounded-like structures within the data. By combining these approaches with well calibration, it is possible to speed up the interpretation (both in absolute and user time), limit the potential model-bias of an interpreter, and improve the quality of the interpretation. The results show that 3D visualization and processing dramatically improved the quality of the seismic data which in turn generated an essential predictive tool for carbonate reservoir characterization.


    Prograding shoal complex: Khuff Formation, Permian, Oman
 
The sediments of Khuff Formation in northwest Oman (Figure 1a) were deposited in a shallow, inner shelf restricted environment dominated by high-energy oolitic shoals and bars with protected lagoons. Main depositional cycles show the characteristics of trangressive-regressive carbonate-evaporite successions, . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
P. Farzadi and J. Hesthammer
Diagnosis of the Upper Cretaceous palaeokarst and turbidite systems from the Iranian Persian Gulf using volume-based multiple seismic attribute analysis and pattern recognition
Petroleum Geoscience, August 1, 2007; 13(3): 227 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists