Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; September 2002; v. 21; no. 9; p. 852-864; DOI: 10.1190/1.1508954
© 2002 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Hydrocarbon detection and monitoring with a multicomponent transient electromagnetic (MTEM) survey

David Wright, Anton Ziolkowski and Bruce Hobbs

The University of Edinburgh, U.K.

Corresponding author: anton.ziolkowski@glg.ed.ac.uk

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

We present results from a transient electromagnetic experiment to detect hydrocarbons and to monitor their movement within a reservoir. The method is illustrated with data obtained from multichannel transient electromagnetic (MTEM) surveys.

In the petroleum industry, seismic reflection is used extensively to determine subsurface structure, and to locate potential reservoirs, but it is usually unable to determine the nature of the fluid content in the rocks. Because we wish to avoid drilling dry holes, it is obviously very important to know before drilling whether a reservoir contains hydrocarbons or not.

EM methods have the potential to reduce the risk of drilling dry holes because they can discriminate between water-saturated reservoirs (low resistivity) and hydrocarbon-saturated reservoirs (high resistivity). Until now, however, decades of research and development have failed to enable this potential to yield results of much value to the petroleum industry.

The bulk resistivity of a rock depends on its porosity, pore fluid resistivity, and saturation. Consequently, resistivity well logs are used routinely to calculate the porosity and saturation of reservoir rocks. When the pore fluid within a rock changes from water to hydrocarbons, most physical properties of the rock change. Electrical resistivity is most affected. Replacement of brine by oil in a reservoir can cause a change in electrical resistivity of reservoir rock of as much as four orders of magnitude; on the other hand, it has very little effect on acoustic impedance (Figure 1).


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The effect of changing brine saturation on resistivity and P-wave velocity (redrawn from Wilt and Alumbaugh, 1998).

 
Figure 2, an example of a typically strong resistivity contrast, shows part of a resistivity log from a well in the underground gas storage reservoir used in our experiment. Gas is present at a depth of 490 m and resistivity increases from approximately 20 . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists