Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; September 2002; v. 21; no. 9; p. 838-851; DOI: 10.1190/1.1508944
© 2002 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galbraith, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

3D geometry for demultiple and noise cancellation

Mike Galbraith

Seismic Image Software, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Corresponding author: mike@sisimage.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The simple process of CMP stack can act as a powerful mechanism for suppression of multiples and attenuation of many types of linear shot noise (air waves, ground roll, backscatter). In any 3D acquisition geometry, each CMP bin will have a variety of traces that have different shot-receiver offsets and azimuths. These recorded traces will be processed through various algorithms such as scaling, NMO, statics corrections, and so forth prior to summing them into CMP stack traces. The act of summing or stacking will increase coherent signal content and reduce incoherent (uncorrelated) noise—noise such as linear shot noise and multiples (whether surface or interbed).

The offset and azimuth distribution of the traces in a CMP bin plays a critical role in determining the effectiveness of attenuating multiples and other noise. Thus, the CMP stack of the noise component of the recorded seismic data varies from bin to bin according to the offset distribution.

Different geometries lead to different attenuation characteristics. It is instructive to investigate some key factors in 3D geometries to see their effect on noise attenuation in general. These key factors are: aspect ratio (width versus length of the recording patch), ratio of shot line interval to receiver line interval, and angle of shot lines to receiver lines (slanted geometries).

Synthetic linear noise and multiples can be generated to investigate the effects of these key factors. By knowing the levels of input noise, the level of output noise can be established (through CMP stacking) at various points throughout the CMP bins of a particular 3D geometry. Hence, a range of noise attenuation may be assigned to a 3D geometry.


    Selection of narrow and wide 3D geometries
 
In creating different geometries for analysis, it is important that the main parameters should be the same. In other words the geometries will have: different aspect ratio, same fold, . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists