Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cordsen, A. Articles by Galbraith, M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Narrow- versus wide-azimuth land 3D seismic surveys

GEDCO, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Mike Galbraith

Seismic Image Software, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Corresponding author: acordsen@gedco.com

Corresponding author: mike@sisimage.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

It appears that there are two very distinct schools of thought with respect to the patch configuration for land 3D seismic surveys; often the like or dislike of one over another is based on which part of the business one is involved in rather than any scientific reason. Oil and gas companies (after all the clients) may prefer a wide recording patch to maximize the truly 3D coverage while acquisition contractors (if given a choice) may opt for a narrow recording patch for operational reasons. There are more reasons than these to consider either recording patch and the benefits of both need to be considered when designing a 3D survey.

The distinction between narrow- and wide-azimuth surveys is made on the basis of the aspect ratio of the recording patch. The aspect ratio is defined as the cross-line dimension of the patch divided by the in-line dimension. Recording patches with an aspect ratio of less than 0.5 are narrow azimuth and those greater than 0.5 are wide azimuth (Cordsen et al., 2000). Wide-azimuth patches often have aspect ratios of 0.8-1.0 (Figure 1a); narrow-azimuth patches may very well have aspect ratios as low as 0.2 (Figure 1b).

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Wide versus narrow patch—template and fold. In all figures showing lines, the receiver lines are laid out east-west and blue. Source lines are red. (a) Wide-azimuth template. (b) Narrow-azimuth template. (c) Wide-azimuth fold distribution at full offsets. (d) Narrow-azimuth fold distribution at full offsets. (e) Wide-azimuth fold distribution at 1500-m offsets. (f) Narrow-azimuth fold distribution at 1500-m offsets.