Quick
Search: 		  
advanced search
 GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Leading Edge; July 2002; v. 21; no. 7; p. 675-680; DOI: 10.1190/1.1497323
© 2002 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mallick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Dutta, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Shallow water flow prediction using prestack waveform inversion of conventional 3D seismic data and rock modeling

Subhashis Mallick and Nader C. Dutta

WesternGeco, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: SMallick@houston.westerngeco.slb.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Shallow water flow (SWF) layers are frequently encountered in deepwater areas when drilling into poorly consolidated geopressured sands (Figure 1). These sands, when flowing, can cause extensive damage to a borehole. More than $200 million has been lost to date for remediation and prevention of SWF problems in the Gulf of Mexico. Lately, this problem has also been a concern in many other deepwater clastic basins in the world.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Shallow water flow problem encountered in deepwater drilling.

 
SWF sands are known to occur in water depths of 450 m or more and typically 300–600 m below the mudline. They are known to be present in almost all deepwater ocean basins where the rate of sedimentation is high. Figure 2 shows the formation of SWF layers in a deepwater environment. Loose and unconsolidated sediments with a high rate of sedimentation characterize the overburden and low permeability seal is created by compacted shales or mudstones for which the rate of sedimentation is low. If isolated sand bodies are in this shale or mudstone, water from such bodies will not escape easily due to the presence of low-permeability sediments around them. In addition, the high rate of sedimentation from the overburden exerts an enormous pressure on these sediments, causing these isolated bodies containing large amounts of water to be overpressured. These overpressured SWF layers pose a threat to drilling, and their identification prior to drilling is therefore important in reducing risk. In this paper, we study the feasibility of detecting SWF layers using prestack waveform inversion of seismic data in conjunction with geologic analysis of stratigraphic sequences related to SWF zones.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Formation mechanism of SWF sands.

 

   Rock properties of SWF sediments
 
In-situ measurements of elastic and other rock properties of SWF sediments are very limited because SWF layers are associated with very low sonic velocities. Measurement . . . [Full Text of this Article]






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists