Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; June 2002; v. 21; no. 6; p. 520-521; DOI: 10.1190/1.1490645
© 2002 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liner, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Seismic processing 1982–2002

Christopher L. Liner

TLE Editorial Board

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

On the occasion of THE LEADING EDGE'S 20th anniversary, it seems appropriate to pause and consider progress in our science over that period of time. My topic is seismic data processing, and many of the advances discussed here were published first in GEOPHYSICS or other peer-reviewed journals, then appeared in more digestible form in the pages of TLE. This is an important role TLE continues to play.

The first thing to consider is the scope of the assignment. The last 20 years have seen 267 monthly or bimonthly issues of GEOPHYSICS, which I will use as a gauge of progress. Conservatively estimating 10 papers per issue related to seismic topics, it follows that something like 2700 individual papers span the period. Any thought of a detailed account must be abandoned.

Furthermore, it is not feasible for this reviewer to reread all the papers, or the abstracts, or even the titles. In other words, I am left to summarize this mass of material based on the impressions of someone who has been involved in data processing teaching and research for these 20 years. Are there people better qualified to do this? Certainly. Would their accounts be different? In detail, undoubtedly; in broad scope, probably not. As I imagine any reviewer would, I will touch here on the "first-order" advances in seismic data processing, those things that have changed the way the work is done around the world every day.

First a distinction. By seismic data processing, I mean any computational technique that attempts to remove noise or wave propagation effects in order to create an image of the subsurface. Once this image is created, there is another universe of methods to mine the data for further information.

Examples include attribute analysis, coherency, . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists