Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; May 2002; v. 21; no. 5; p. 459; DOI: 10.1190/1.1481252
© 2002 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gochioco, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Introduction to this special section

Near-surface geophysics

Lawrence M. Gochioco

Tom Wilson

Igochioco@gxt.com

tom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The last time TLE published a near-surface geophysics special section was in November 1997. Since then, the level of technological improvement has gained momentum and new applications. This is clearly demonstrated by the papers submitted to this special section. Interestingly, nearly half of them came from first-time TLE authors. In addition, the source distribution was broad based including some international papers—a positive sign that TLE has succeeded as a global information vehicle by which geophysicists of various backgrounds share ideas, concepts, and experiences.

It is apparent, unfortunately, that near-surface geophysicists rarely interact and associate with petroleum geophysicists. This is likely due to a lack of understandinG—i.e., many geophysicists perceive these pursuits as two distinct disciplines because geophysical methods are conducted at different boundary conditions and for different target types. This impression is wrong; no matter what the target size and its corresponding depth, the "physics" is the same.

Consider ground-penetrating radar (GPR), a technique which experienced explosive growth in development and application over the last decade. The source frequency usually ranges from 150 to 900 MHz, and GPR data are recorded in the nanosecond range—six orders of magnitude above typical seismic frequencies employed in petroleum . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists