Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; December 2002; v. 21; no. 12; p. 1204; DOI: 10.1190/1.1536134
© 2002 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roden, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gochioco, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

PSDM 2, The Sequel

Rocky Roden and Lawrence M. Gochioco

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The first special section on prestack depth migration (PSDM) was published in May 2001. The papers provided a synopsis of the state of PSDM at that time. In fact, some issues limiting greater employment of PSDM described in that special section are still prevalent today—i.e., poor data quality, improper geologic models and velocity fields, inaccurate processing algorithms, anisotropy, near surface effects, lack of true amplitude preservation, and relatively high computing costs to run the full wave equation PSDM algorithms. However, the industry has since made great strides to resolve these issues because of the rapid growth in computing power and development of more efficient migration algorithms. It was due to these advances that TLE decided to revisit this depth imaging technology and quickly publish a sequel.

This special section contains eight articles that pinpoint some improvements made over the last 18 months. The first two articles by Guo and Fagin describe the velocity model building process as it is commonly practiced today and how this ultimately dictates the quality of the final depth image. The articles are written with the depth imager and interpreter in mind because the . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists