Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; December 2002; v. 21; no. 12; p. 1197-1198; DOI: 10.1190/1.1536132
© 2002 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G. R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An improved algorithm for the Euler deconvolution of potential field data

G. R. J. Cooper

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Corresponding author: grcooper@iafrica.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Euler deconvolution (Thomson 1982, Reid et al. 1990) is a commonly used semiautomatic interpretation method for magnetic and gravity data. It can be used to indicate locations and depths of anomalous bodies, indicating regions of interest that can be followed up by detailed modeling. Recent work has suggested the usefulness of applying Euler deconvolution to the vertical gradient of the potential field data (Ravat et al. 2002, Hsu 2002). Because the vertical gradient anomaly is narrower than that of the field itself, its use provides improved horizontal resolution of the solutions. However the greater the order of the gradient used, the greater the problems with noise become (because the vertical derivative operator is a high-pass filter). This paper suggests a way around this problem for the first vertical derivative and uses synthetic models of magnetic and gravity data to show the benefits of the approach.


    Euler deconvolution
 
Euler's equation can be stated as (Hsu, 2002):

(1)
where (x0, y0, z0) is the source location, (x, y, z) is the measurement location (usually the center of a window of datapoints), N is the structural index (a measure of the rate of decay of the field f with distance from the source, and a parameter of the source geometry), and {Delta}f and B are the anomaly and the field base level. If equation 1 is applied to the first vertical gradient of the data, then it becomes;

(2)

As can be seen equation . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists