|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Schlumberger, Gatwick, England, United Kingdom
Corresponding author: leaney@slb.com
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Processing multicomponent surface seismic data for converted mode imaging is geophysically demanding. The usual challenges confronting conventional P-wave processing are compounded by the problems of determining a second (shear) velocity field, asymmetric raypaths, much stronger anisotropy effects, and often increased attenuation.
In this paper we review our methodology to build and calibrate an anisotropic (VTI), anelastic model at a well and discuss how this model is used to process multicomponent data. One benefit of our calibrated model-based approach is that the viability of using other propagation modes such as PSs events can be easily assessed. Another benefit is that processing can happen directly in depth, although a more conventional time-based processing sequence is also enhanced with a simplified workflow that is consistent for moveout correction and CCP binning.
| Arguing for borehole data integration |
|---|
In deepwater OBC cases, the problem of CCP binning is exacerbated by the further asymmetry introduced by the water layer itself. This must be dealt with both for the Ps waves and the Pp waves. Although full 3-D redatuming is desirable, in practice it is not often applied. In such cases the effect of the water layer on binning must be addressed.
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |