Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; September 2001; v. 20; no. 9; p. 996-1007; DOI: 10.1190/1.1487321
© 2001 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leaney, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tcherkashnev, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Borehole-integrated anisotropic processing of converted modes

Scott Leaney, Richard Bale, Mark Wheeler and Sergei Tcherkashnev

Schlumberger, Gatwick, England, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: leaney@slb.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Processing multicomponent surface seismic data for converted mode imaging is geophysically demanding. The usual challenges confronting conventional P-wave processing are compounded by the problems of determining a second (shear) velocity field, asymmetric raypaths, much stronger anisotropy effects, and often increased attenuation.

In this paper we review our methodology to build and calibrate an anisotropic (VTI), anelastic model at a well and discuss how this model is used to process multicomponent data. One benefit of our calibrated model-based approach is that the viability of using other propagation modes such as PSs events can be easily assessed. Another benefit is that processing can happen directly in depth, although a more conventional time-based processing sequence is also enhanced with a simplified workflow that is consistent for moveout correction and CCP binning.


    Arguing for borehole data integration
 
Standard time processing of converted waves requires determining two effective velocity fields to moveout correct and stack the Pp and Ps data, assuming an initial value for vertical VP/VS. Once this is done, the processor often correlates geologic events on the two sections or volumes to obtain an improved vertical VP/VS ratio in order to properly bin the data into common conversion point (CCP) gathers. CCP binning, in turn, affects the Ps velocity analysis, so some iteration is needed. Alternatively, techniques now exist to scan the data for the necessary VP/VS ratios for CCP binning. Either procedure is interpretive and time consuming.

In deepwater OBC cases, the problem of CCP binning is exacerbated by the further asymmetry introduced by the water layer itself. This must be dealt with both for the Ps waves and the Pp waves. Although full 3-D redatuming is desirable, in practice it is not often applied. In such cases the effect of the water layer on binning must be addressed.

. . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists