Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; September 2001; v. 20; no. 9; p. 1053-1055; DOI: 10.1190/1.1487312
© 2001 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engelmark, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Using 4-C to characterize lithologies and fluids in clastic reservoirs

Folke Engelmark

WesternGeco—Seismic Reservoir Services, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Corresponding author: folke.engelmark@slb.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Multicomponent seismic has been around for a long time without gaining widespread acceptance. The potential benefits of having both compressional (P-wave) and shear (S-wave) information have never been disputed, but the cost of acquiring and processing the large data volumes has been high and the quality of the S-wave data has sometimes not met expectations.

However, recent technological developments in the area of sources, sensors, telemetry, and data processing are making multicomponent data increasingly popular as a way to provide better quality data at lower cost.

Although shear information can be accessed through the AVO response of the P-waves, the pure shear (SS) mode or the converted shear wave (PS) mode provide direct and more accurate information about the shear properties of the subsurface. Getting this improved information about the elastic properties of the subsurface is indeed one of the main reasons for acquiring multicomponent data.

There are two major ways of acquiring multicomponent seismic data. Land multicomponent seismic is typically acquired using dedicated vertically and horizontally polarized traction sources to generate downgoing P- and S-wave modes. The seismic can then be recorded as three-component (3-C) or nine-component (9-C) data sets. The latter involves three consecutive 3-C recordings of direct and converted modes by activating each dedicated source mode in turn (i.e., vertical followed by in-line and cross-line horizontal components).

Marine multicomponent data, known as 4-C, is acquired using the traditional air-gun sources to generate a pressure wave (PP), but the receivers are on the seafloor to record the 3-D vector field. The fourth component is a hydrophone recording the pressure field just like ordinary seismic streamers.

By placing three-component geophones on the seafloor, converted shear waves, known as the PS mode, can also be recorded. . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
P. KRISTIANSEN and J. WAGGONER
Using multicomponent seismic data to better characterize and manage reservoirs
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 1377 - 1384.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists