Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; September 2001; v. 20; no. 9; p. 1042-1047; DOI: 10.1190/1.1487310
© 2001 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Dok, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gaiser, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Stratigraphic description of the Morrow Formation using mode-converted shear waves

Interpretation tools and techniques for three land surveys

Richard Van Dok and James Gaiser

WesternGeco, Denver, Colorado, U.S.

Corresponding author: rich.van.dok@westgeo.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Historically, the Pennsylvanian Morrow Formation has been a challenging target for conventional, compressional wave (P-wave) seismic acquisition. A relatively small acoustic-impedance change associated with the thin, productive sand targets has rendered P-wave data a marginally useful, but not definitive, tool in these regions. To address this problem, three land 3-D/3-C surveys were acquired to investigate the use of modeconverted shear waves (PS waves) in defining and describing these sand channels. The three surveys, although located in different basins, represent a progression in our understanding of survey design, processing, and interpretation using multicomponent reflection seismic.

When applied to PS waves, conventional interpretation techniques such as amplitude or isochron mapping are often adequate to analyze the data. In some cases, however, more specialized tools may be required. Akey concern for all the surveys was the correct correlation of events between P-wave and PS-wave volumes. In some situations, the character of the geology was sufficient to make a good visual tie. In others, more subtle indicators were used to make the correlation. Correlation-based VP/VS analysis techniques can provide more detail and can highlight subtle features missed by subjective interpretation methods. The time-to-depth correlation difficulty also emphasizes the value of additional information such as P-wave and shear-wave (S-wave) sonic logs or VSP surveys, which were not generally available. Although interpretation results for these surveys are preliminary, each shows significant promise in the use of PS waves.

The three surveys in this study were recorded in southwestern Kansas, the Panhandle of Oklahoma, and south-eastern New Mexico (Figure 1). Although quite separate in location, they share a common target reservoir within the Morrow Formation. The Morrow is Pennsylvanian in age and primarily a shale unit with interspersed sand accumulations along with oolitic limestones . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
P. KRISTIANSEN and J. WAGGONER
Using multicomponent seismic data to better characterize and manage reservoirs
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 1377 - 1384.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists