Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; August 2001; v. 20; no. 8; p. 803-816; DOI: 10.1190/1.1487289
© 2001 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muerdter, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ratcliff, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Understanding subsalt illumination through ray-trace modeling, Part 3

Salt ridges and furrows, and the impact of acquisition orientation

David Muerdter

Diamond Geophysical Research, Redmond, Washington, U.S.

Davis Ratcliff

Diamond Geophysical, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: davem@dgrc.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The complex structure and high velocity of salt in the Gulf of Mexico create seismic imaging difficulties. 3-D prestack depth migration (PreSDM) of seismic data allows imaging of reflectors under the salt sheets and of detached bodies of irregular shape. But 3-D PreSDM cannot fill in shadow zones below salt where little data were recorded. Additionally, amplitude variations caused by salt structures focusing or dispersing seismic energy are usually poorly handled by 3-D PreSDM. Ray-trace modeling can clarify subsalt imaging problems, and the modeling results should be incorporated into exploration and development plans.

The modeling process in this paper involves creating computer models that include salt shapes and velocity variations, ray tracing an entire 3-D seismic survey, and sorting the simulated data into CRP gathers. Care must be taken in building and ray tracing the model to produce amplitude results that can be compared with seismic amplitudes on subsalt reflectors.

This is the third and final part of the subsalt illumination paper. In the first two parts, simple 2-D models were ray traced to investigate the subsalt illuminations beneath flat salt slabs, salt lenses, salt edges of various shapes, dipping salt bodies, and salt peaks. In this third part, salt ridges and troughs or furrows are studied, including the effect of the shooting direction angle to the structural dip. Comparisons are made with similar salt shapes in real seismic data taken from 3-D prestack depth migration surveys in the Gulf of Mexico. Although this study provides insights into possible imaging anomalies, these simple models may not exhibit the illumination produced by complex interaction of real-world shapes and velocity variations. Ray tracing or other modeling techniques should be used to ascertain the illumination under these more complex structures.

As in the previous parts of this paper, the selection of features to . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. A. Stewart
Salt tectonics in the North Sea Basin: a structural style template for seismic interpreters
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 272(1): 361 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists