|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
University of Denver, Colorado, U.S.
Corresponding author: K. Mahrer, kmahrer@du.edu
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
My last column began a two-part series on clearer sentences based on Joseph M. Williams' vade mecum STYLE Toward Clarity and Grace. Part 1 introduced and developed Williams' first two principles of clear writing: subjects=characters and verbs=their actions. In clear sentences, the subjects and verbs overlay the characters and actions.
| Subject and characters |
|---|
Sometimes the subjects name a means by which an unstated character performs an action: Studies of fault traps show that ... which really means: People who study fault traps, find that ...
("Studies" takes the role of a character and that's clear enough). In poor sentences, however, characters are typically not explicit, and a review is required to bring them to light. In extreme cases, the characters may be so deeply buried below the surface that only the authors can revise and extract them from obscurity. The reconstruction of these sentences is the bane of all reviewers and editors.
| Verbs and action |
|---|
There has been
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |