Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; February 2001; v. 20; no. 2; p. 198-199; DOI: 10.1190/1.1438912
© 2001 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wempe, W.
Right arrow Articles by Mavko, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Three distinct porosity domains defined physically, hydraulically, electrically, and elastically

Wendy Wempe and Gary Mavko

Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.

Corresponding author: W. Wempe, wempe@stanfordalumni.org

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The goal of rock physics analysis is to explore relationships between geophysical observations and physical properties in earth materials. Historically, rock physics theory and empirical relationships have been used to constrain porosity estimates, leading to improved reservoir, environmental, and geotechnical characterizations. In this paper, we discuss three total porosity domains, each with differing physical, hydraulic, elastic, and electrical properties. These porosity domains are separated by the system's porous percolation threshold and critical porosity, both of which can be estimated using percolation theory.


    Percolation thresholds and porosity types
 
Picture a simple system of, let's say, saturated grains that have been sufficiently cemented so that the pores have reached a point of isolation and disconnection (Figure 1a); in other words, the pores are "suspended" in the granular medium. Now, picture a saturated system of grains so loose that the grains are suspended in the saturating fluid (Figure 1b); in other words, the grains are isolated and disconnected.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pore space schematics for (a) porosity percolation threshold, (b) granular critical porosity, and (c) porosity type.

 
The first system is at its porous percolation threshold (i.e., the pores no longer percolate) and the second is at its granular percolation threshold, also known as critical porosity (i.e., the grains no longer "percolate"; they are disconnected). Percolation theory defines the threshold at which randomly oriented ellipsoids, whether pores or grains, are no . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists