|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.
Corresponding author: M. Prasad, manika.prasad@stanford.edu
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Various methods can characterize microstructural properties of reservoir rocks with the ultimate goal of relating microstructure to seismic properties. Scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and optical microscopy have traditionally been used for such studies. They have identified lithology, pore space, interconnectivity of pores, grain size, and cementation as the most important factors controlling seismic wave velocity and attenuation. However, these techniques provide qualitative descriptions only. The acoustic techniques presented here, scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) and acoustic sounding (AS), can map and, more importantly, quantify microstructure as variations in acoustic impedance.
Ultrasonic stress waves are sensitive to local variations in elastic properties and are therefore particularly suited for characterizing microstructural properties of reservoir rocks. Reflections from impedance boundaries in grains and between interfaces in the sample are used to construct the microstructural image.
This paper will show that acoustic microscopy can be a powerful tool for studying internal structure and pore geometry of reservoir rocks.
| Working principles |
|---|
Because the working frequency of the acoustic waves can be varied, their penetration depth into the sample and the resolution of microstructural features can be controlled.
I will present results from high-frequency SAM (0.12 GHz) and low-frequency AS (25100 MHz). The resolution of SAM is about 1 µm at 1 GHz; AS
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |