Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; July 2000; v. 19; no. 7; p. 726-728; DOI: 10.1190/1.1438700
© 2000 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bear, G.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The construction of subsurface illumination and amplitude maps via ray tracing

Glenn Bear, Chih-Ping Lu, Richard Lu and Dennis Willen

ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Ian Watson

ExxonMobil Exploration Company, Houston, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: glenn.w.bear@exxon.sprint.com

Editor's note: This article was selected as the Best Poster Paper at SEG's 1999 Annual Meeting. Due to its quantitative nature, the 1999 Best Student Poster Paper will not be published in TLE but in a future issue of G, without undergoing peer-review.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The goal of a seismic survey is to illuminate subsurface geologic formations that may hold hydrocarbon accumulations. Conventional seismic survey design relies on the assumption that uniform midpoint coverage will lead to uniform illumination in the subsurface as long as each midpoint is hit by a sufficient range of offsets. In areas of complex velocity structure, severe wavefield distortions lead to irregular subsurface illumination patterns, even if surface midpoint maps show a uniform distribution. A more appropriate approach is to design seismic surveys to ensure illumination of key subsurface horizons.

The difference between midpoint coverages and subsurface illumination patterns is particularly large in salt-prone areas (Muerdter et al., 1997). Due to severe wave distortion through complex, high-velocity salt bodies, conventional design methods that result in relatively uniform surface coverage (Figure 1) generate uneven amplitudes and shadow zones on subsalt horizons, an effect that is shown clearly by ray-trace modeling of an entire seismic survey (Figure 2).


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Total hits in each surface bin resulting from a 3-D seismic survey collected along east-west lines. Distances are in kilofeet.

 

Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Amplitude of a subsurface (subsalt) horizon recorded by the 3-D survey in Figure 1. This amplitude map was constructed by collecting ray-trace results (amplitudes of each hit) at each subsurface bin on the 3-D . . . [Full Text of this Article]

 






JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists