|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.
Corresponding author: mfagan@cera.com
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The impact of technology, especially information technology, is widely credited as the main driver in reducing upstream costs and enabling the E&P industry to survive the 1986 oil price collapse and the oil price volatility that has followed. But the actual concrete proofa measurement of just how much credit technology deservesis less clear.
To answer the crucial questionWhat is the role of technology in reducing costs?we conducted a multiyear in-depth look at finding and development (F&D) costs for more than 25 companies through the 1980s and 1990s.
Note, in the following, F&D costs are calculated as exploration and development expenditures over three years, divided by additions to reserves over the same time. Three-year periods were used to smooth volatility in discoveries and account for some of the time lag between drilling and booking reserves.
| Methodology for measuring the impact of technical change |
|---|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |