The Leading Edge; December 2000; v. 19; no. 12;
p. 1324-1328; DOI: 10.1190/1.1438542
© 2000 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
The future journal
Christopher L. Liner
SEG Editor 19992001
Corresponding author: C. Liner, cliner@seg.org
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.
|
The advance of science and technology is facilitated by (some would say due to) the publication of peer-review journals. While the goal of such journalsto deliver top-quality informationhas not changed, it is inevitable that their production details are under intense pressure from developments in networking and electronic publication. Will journals disappear or morph into new, more efficient forms? As always, before delving into the future it is instructive to browse through the past.
 |
History of peer-review
|
|---|
Natural history, astronomy, and many other sciences date back to ancient times, but the concept of a scientific journal was born in 1665 with publication of the first volume of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Figure 1). This was the venue for disseminating the discoveries and inquiries of a remarkable group of early scientists, including Robert Hooke, Edmund Halley, and Isaac Newton. Although this is a landmark in scientific publishing, it would take a serious stretch of the imagination to consider the early Royal Society Transactions a peer-reviewed journal. There was no systematic policy or protocol in place to have submitted papers scrutinized by fellow scientists for merit or correctness. It was more a matter of the editor screening contributions and the membership responding to them once in print.
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Title page from volume 1 of the world's first scientific journal (from Internet site of Univer-sity of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Special Collections).
|
|
Remarkably, the lack of systematic peer review persisted for very nearly three centuriesnot just with the Royal Society Transactions, of course, but also with the countless journals that evolved in diverse fields like physics, mathematics, medicine, and (eventually) geophysics. For obvious reasons, the history of peer review for medical journals has been the subject of intense self-scrutiny (e.g., articles by Burnham and Judson cited in "Suggested reading" at the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists