Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; December 2000; v. 19; no. 12; p. 1324-1328; DOI: 10.1190/1.1438542
© 2000 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liner, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The future journal

Christopher L. Liner

SEG Editor 1999–2001

Corresponding author: C. Liner, cliner@seg.org

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The advance of science and technology is facilitated by (some would say due to) the publication of peer-review journals. While the goal of such journals—to deliver top-quality information—has not changed, it is inevitable that their production details are under intense pressure from developments in networking and electronic publication. Will journals disappear or morph into new, more efficient forms? As always, before delving into the future it is instructive to browse through the past.


    History of peer-review
 
Natural history, astronomy, and many other sciences date back to ancient times, but the concept of a scientific journal was born in 1665 with publication of the first volume of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Figure 1). This was the venue for disseminating the discoveries and inquiries of a remarkable group of early scientists, including Robert Hooke, Edmund Halley, and Isaac Newton. Although this is a landmark in scientific publishing, it would take a serious stretch of the imagination to consider the early Royal Society Transactions a peer-reviewed journal. There was no systematic policy or protocol in place to have submitted papers scrutinized by fellow scientists for merit or correctness. It was more a matter of the editor screening contributions and the membership responding to them once in print.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Title page from volume 1 of the world's first scientific journal (from Internet site of Univer-sity of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Special Collections).

 
Remarkably, the lack of systematic peer review persisted for very nearly three centuries—not just with the Royal Society Transactions, of course, but also with the countless journals that evolved in diverse fields like physics, mathematics, medicine, and (eventually) geophysics. For obvious reasons, the history of peer review for medical journals has been the subject of intense self-scrutiny (e.g., articles by Burnham and Judson cited in "Suggested reading" at the . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists