Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duffaut, K. Articles by Landrø, M. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Shear-wave elastic impedance

Statoil, Trondheim, Norway

Martin Landrø

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Corresponding author: K. Duffaut, kdu@statoil.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

It is well known that if we are able to estimate acoustic impedance (AI) and a parameter related to shear-wave velocity from seismic data, our ability to discriminate between different lithologies and fluid phases will increase. Prestack inversion on individual CDP gathers and inverting directly for V_P, V_S, and density have been tested in several ways, but the estimated parameters are often poorly determined.

A more robust approach is to apply poststack inversion on partial stacks. For inversion of the near-offset stack, AI can be calculated directly from well logs. However, for the far-offset stack, we need to derive an equivalent of the acoustic impedance that can be used to calibrate the non-zero-offset seismic reflectivity. Connolly (1998, 1999) derived such an equivalent—elastic impedance (EI)—and demonstrated how, by using elastic impedance logs (which requires shear-wave logs), he was able to perform well calibration and inversion of far-offset data.

This article describes a new function—shear-wave elastic impedance (SEI)—for linking converted-wave stacks to wells using a linearization of the Zoeppritz equations. SEI is similar to EI but adapted to P-S converted seismic data. It can be computed from acoustic log data (P- and S-wave velocities and density) and used for well calibration, wavelet estimation, and inversion of P-S reflectivity data leading to improved interpretability of converted wave data. (Equation 4 in Appendix 1 is the key mathematical formula in this approach to SEI).

	Example of SEI

 
To test the SEI technique, we used a 3-D four-component (4-C) ocean-bottom cable (OBC) survey acquired in 1997 that covers approximately 10 km² of the Statfjord Field (Rognø et al., 1999). Both P-wave and converted-wave data were 3-D prestack time-migrated. The hydrophone (P) and the vertical geophone (Z) component were summed to attenuate receiver side water-layer reverberations and both . . . [Full Text of this Article]