Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2000; v. 19; no. 1; p. 80-83; DOI: 10.1190/1.1438466
© 2000 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sacchi, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ulrych, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Nonminimum-phase wavelet estimation using higher order statistics

Mauricio D. Sacchi

The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Tadeusz J. Ulrych

The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Corresponding author: M. Sacchi, sacchi@phys.ualberta.ca

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Seismic data are often represented by the well known convolutional model:

(1)
where w(t) denotes the seismic wavelet, r(t) the reflectivity series, and n(t) additive noise. The goal of seismic deconvolution is to design a filter f(t) capable of removing or compressing the wavelet. To understand the effect of removing the wavelet from the seismogram, convolve both sides of equation (1) with the filter

(2)

The last equation says that deconvolution can be successfully carried out if and only if two conditions are satisfied:

(3)

(4)
When these two conditions are simultaneously satisfied, one can write:

(5)

Equations (3) and (4) define a filter-design problem. However, in order to design f(t), one must first know the wavelet, w(t). Unfortunately, in most exploration scenarios, w(t) is not known and, therefore, needs to be estimated.

This article focuses on estimating a wavelet with unknown amplitude and phase spectrum. Explicitly, the problem has one noisy observation (the seismogram) and two unknowns (the reflectivity and the seismic wavelet). We will examine how under certain conditions the stochastic nature of the reflectivity sequence can be exploited to estimate the wavelet.


    Stochastic wavelet estimation
 
Stochastic wavelet estimation is often divided into two distinct problems:

Problem 1 (estimation): Under proper assumptions, we can compute a functional of the wavelet directly from s(t), the observed data. The functional must be capable of reducing the unknown random r(t) to a tractable quantity. It is also desirable to have a functional that annihilates the additive random noise n(t). In mathematical terms, we seek an operator F such that

(6)
where kr is a constant and G another functional to determine.

Problem 2 (spectral factorization): This can be summarized as: Given an estimate of G[w(t)], how do we estimate w(t)? The latter leads to a new problem: Is w(t) uniquely determined by G[w(t)]?


    The importance of non-Gaussianity
 
. . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists