|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Corresponding author: M. Sacchi, sacchi@phys.ualberta.ca
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Seismic data are often represented by the well known convolutional model:
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
The last equation says that deconvolution can be successfully carried out if and only if two conditions are satisfied:
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
Equations (3) and (4) define a filter-design problem. However, in order to design f(t), one must first know the wavelet, w(t). Unfortunately, in most exploration scenarios, w(t) is not known and, therefore, needs to be estimated.
This article focuses on estimating a wavelet with unknown amplitude and phase spectrum. Explicitly, the problem has one noisy observation (the seismogram) and two unknowns (the reflectivity and the seismic wavelet). We will examine how under certain conditions the stochastic nature of the reflectivity sequence can be exploited to estimate the wavelet.
| Stochastic wavelet estimation |
|---|
Problem 1 (estimation): Under proper assumptions, we can compute a functional of the wavelet directly from s(t), the observed data. The functional must be capable of reducing the unknown random r(t) to a tractable quantity. It is also desirable to have a functional that annihilates the additive random noise n(t). In mathematical terms, we seek an operator F such that
![]() | (6) |
Problem 2 (spectral factorization): This can be summarized as: Given an estimate of G[w(t)], how do we estimate w(t)? The latter leads to a new problem: Is w(t) uniquely determined by G[w(t)]?
| The importance of non-Gaussianity |
|---|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |