Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2000; v. 19; no. 1; p. 50-55; DOI: 10.1190/1.1438454
© 2000 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An overview of wavelet estimation using free-surface multiple removal

Ken Matson

ARCO, Plano, Texas, U.S.

Corresponding author: kmatson@mail.arco.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The goal of true-amplitude processing is to relate the measured seismic amplitudes to earth reflectivity in an absolute sense. A significant barrier to this longstanding objective has been the difficulty of estimating and removing the source effects from our seismic data. To illustrate the need for this, let us assume the simple model that the data contain reflection coefficients convolved with some source waveform. It is clear that we cannot properly analyze these reflection coefficients without first removing the phase and amplitude effects of the source. Fortunately, geophysicists have been able to extract much useful information through relative amplitude processing and will continue to do so in the future. However, the increasing demands placed on the fidelity of seismically derived information for tasks such as reservoir characterization heighten the need for better source wavelet estimation to bring us closer to processing absolute amplitudes.

Recent advances in free-surface multiple removal (FSMR) provide a significant step forward in realizing the goal of absolute-amplitude processing. In principle, the removal of free-surface multiples requires absolute measurements of the pressure field near the surface (for marine data application). Hence, the source wavelet must be known and effectively removed from the data for this process to be successful. Coupling the objective of free-surface multiple attenuation to the objective of wavelet estimation has provided newfound leverage in the wavelet-estimation problem. By using the multiple-attenuation machinery as a wavelet-estimation scheme, we can obtain estimates of the source wavelet in the water, independent of the subsurface. While significant, keep in mind that this represents only a first step toward absolute-amplitude processing since the earth invariably imparts some distortion/attenuation to the wavelet below the water bottom. In other words, this does not address the problem of estimating and deconvolving the wavelet at depth. This article gives an overview of some . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists