|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Petroleum Technology and Applied Geophysics, NTNU, Norway
Corresponding author: M. Landrø, mlan@ipt.ntnu.no
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In experimental physics disciplines (e.g., particle physics, optics), it is essential to have detailed knowledge of the signal used to investigate or probe a target. For the seismic experiment, exact determination of the input signal has not been addressed to the same extent. In my opinion there are two major reasons for this lack of interest:
In a deterministic perspective, we would understand our seismic data in the following way: First determine the source signal before it enters the sedimentary subsurface, then add absorption and scattering effects due to changes in medium parameters as the wavefield propagates through the earth, and in this way obtain a best possible fit with the measured data. I think deterministic approaches like this will be used more frequently in the future because of some recent developments, including:
The following presents the background and main principles of the ministreamer inversion method which was designed for far-field source signature determination.
| From near-field to mid-field measurements |
|---|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |