Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; April 2008; v. 27; no. 4; p. 506-516; DOI: 10.1190/1.2907183
© 2008 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meadows, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Time-lapse seismic modeling and inversion of CO2 saturation for storage and enhanced oil recovery

Mark Meadows

Fugro Seismic Imaging, Houston, USA

Corresponding author: MMeadows{at}fugro.com

It is widely recognized that carbon dioxide (CO2) is an important agent in global warming, and much recent activity has focused on finding ways to reduce, eliminate, or sequester CO2 in order to minimize its impact on the environment. In addition, miscible CO2 floods have become increasingly important as an EOR (enhanced oil recovery) method for recovering residual or bypassed oil, and as an effective mechanism for long-term storage of CO2. Clearly, an understanding of the effects of CO2 on rock-fluid systems, together with an ability to accurately map CO2 fronts during injection, are crucial for improving recovery rates, optimizing well patterns, locating bypassed oil and minimizing the cost of injected CO2. This paper describes a new method to predict and quantify the effects of CO2 injection in porous saline and oil/brine reservoirs using time-lapse seismic data. Unlike many inversion methods, this model-based approach is flexible enough to invert for multiple reservoir properties and their uncertainties using data that may include seismic tuning and other potentially complicating effects.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists