Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; January 2008; v. 27; no. 1; p. 64-69; DOI: 10.1190/1.2831681
© 2008 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farquharson, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geologically constrained gravity inversion for the Voisey's Bay ovoid deposit

Colin G. Farquharson, Michael R. Ash and Hugh G. Miller

Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada

Corresponding author: cgfarquh{at}mun.ca.

Constructing a general, three-dimensional model of the subsurface density distribution by minimum-structure, or Occam-style, inversion of gravity data has been practical now for several years. The usual approach is to seek a model that is simple in the sense of having the least amount of spatial variation while still reproducing the observations (hence the description "minimum-structure"). This has the advantage of generating models with few, if any, fictitious features. However, often the models produced bear only a gross, diffuse resemblance to geology. It has been recognized since the inception of the minimum-structure inversion technique that geological information can be incorporated by seeking a model that is simple in the sense of being as close as possible to a reference model while still fitting the observations. This is rarely done, often because insufficient geological information is available, or because inversion of geophysical data is no longer thought to be useful once a target has been found and drilling begun. Here we summarize a study demonstrating how models constructed using a minimum-structure inversion procedure can be influenced and constrained by reference models derived from downhole physical properties.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists