Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; June 2007; v. 26; no. 6; p. 778-780; DOI: 10.1190/1.2748496
© 2007 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandsberg-Dahl, S.
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Migration of surface seismic data with VSP Green's functions

Sverre Brandsberg-Dahl and Brian Hornby

BP America, Houston, USA

Xiang Xiao

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA

Corresponding author: hornbyb2{at}bp.com

Seismic migration is the process by which wavefields recorded on or near the surface are mapped back into the subsurface to form an image of the subsurface structure. Common to all current migration methods is that they rely on a model of the subsurface for computing Green's functions. These computed Green's functions are approximations of the true Green's function in the subsurface. The more accurate the method used for computing the Green's functions, and to some extent also the choice of imaging condition, the better image we will get. Most state-of-the-art migration methods will use Green's functions that include multiple arrivals and some finite-frequency effects, allowing them to image fairly complex geologic structures. However, the computational model in most cases uses only scalar velocity that is smooth on a wavelength scale, thus ignoring scattering effects from small-scale structure, anisotropy, and other intrinsic rock effects. Further, whatever the model is, it has to be derived from the data itself or some other form of remote measurement of velocity in the subsurface. At the very best, this will be a nonunique solution to an inverse problem based on the data. Commonly, much more crude approximations are used; for example, only trying to match the predicted first arrivals to the observed first arrivals.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists