Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; November 2007; v. 26; no. 11; p. 1434-1437; DOI: 10.1190/1.2805766
© 2007 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helsing, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A new approach to seismic interpretation in challenging imaging environments

C. Edward Helsing and David C. Berman

ExxonMobil, Houston, USA

Corresponding author: carl.e.helsing{at}exxonmobil.com

The structural interpretation of prestack, depth-migrated seismic data has traditionally relied on full-offset stacks, attempting to take advantage of the stacking process to generate a high signal- to-noise ratio. However, in complex velocity environments (for example, subsalt), our observations suggest full-offset stacking can result in a lower signal-to-noise ratio than a partial stack of subsurface angle data. Despite the application of multipathing algorithms such as wave equation PSDM (prestack depth migration) or CRAM (common-reflection-angle migration), the full stack seismic data generally exhibit low signal-to-noise ratios, allowing for multiple valid structural interpretations. (Figure 1). This leads to a variety of common problems when assessing the prospect, well placement, trap/seal, volumes, and the differences in risking a four-way prospect from a three-way prospect.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists