Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
The Leading Edge Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Leading Edge; May 2005; v. 24; no. 5; p. 521-526; DOI: 10.1190/1.1926811
© 2005 Society of Exploration Geophysicists
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raef, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

4D seismic to image a thin carbonate reservoir during a miscible CO2 flood

Hall-Gurney Field, Kansas, USA

Abdelmoneam E. Raef, Richard D. Miller, Evan K. Franseen, Alan P. Byrnes, W. Lynn Watney and William E. Harrison

Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, USA

Corresponding author: rmiller{at}kgs.ku.edu

Time-lapse (TL) seismic monitoring has proven a valuable tool for reservoir management. If available in a timely and cost-effective manner, it can be incorporated into a dynamic reservoir management approach, spec-ifically in terms of assessing sweep efficiency through constraining reservoir simulations, quantifying compartmentalization, and enhancing the placement of infill wells. Thus, cost-effectiveness, rapid turnaround time, and sensitivity of the seismic response to subtle changes in reservoir properties evident in production data are critical assets of a robust and economic TL application. Successful applications of TL monitoring have been predominantly offshore—Gulf of Mexico and North Sea—in thick clastic reservoirs characterized as low technical risk. Changes in TL seismic images as a direct result of enhanced oil recovery operations in low compressibility, "stiff" carbonate reservoirs are so small that distinguishing reservoir fluid changes from background noise on seismic attribute maps is challenging at best and many times impossible. Consequently, reservoirs predicted to produce weak TL anomalies associated with enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations are classified as high-risk cases and languish in what has been designated the "stretch portfolio" of time-lapse application in reservoir management.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Society of Exploration Geophysicists